Cameras spread across zones
Ward-level teams, one command centre, and no single view of what is actually live.
Thousands of cameras across zones, wards and corridors — managed, recorded and analysed from a single control room.
Home › Safe & Smart Cities
City surveillance projects fail on operations, not on cameras. The cameras get installed, and two years later a third of them are offline because nobody was told when they stopped.
Ward-level teams, one command centre, and no single view of what is actually live.
A camera has been down for weeks and it is discovered when its footage is needed.
Density is judged by eye from a wall of feeds during a gathering.
Producing a clip for an FIR means someone scrubbing an archive by hand.
Same platform, same event pipeline, same audit log — only the rules differ.
Zone and ward camera groups, map view, and multi-server recording across the city.
Crowd density, intrusion into restricted areas, abandoned object and camera tamper.
ANPR, violations and corridor congestion on the same command-centre wall.
City deployments live or die on the network and the power. We size the design around the links and UPS you actually have, not the ones in the tender document.
Yes, in most cases as a parallel or federated deployment. Whether it can consume the existing streams depends on the current system's licensing.
Analytics runs anonymously by default. Identity features are deployed only where there is a lawful basis, with retention and audit configured up front.
Tell us the site, the camera count and what you need to catch. We will tell you what is realistic before anyone talks price.